This website has moved to:

http://solbergweb.com/james/engineer/research/noise.html

 

 
 
 
 

The use of feedback control to minimize acoustic emissions from an electronic expansion valve

Research sponsored by
Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Center
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
1206 West Green Street
Urbana, IL 61801


Abstract

When automotive air conditioners are started up on a hot day, they can create whistling and hissing noises.  These noises have resulted in customer complaints.  It has been shown that the acoustic emissions results from high speed, single phase vapor refrigerant flowing through the evaporator.  An objective of this project is to measure acoustic emissions under various operating conditions, and then develop a control scheme that will minimize acoustic emissions.

In order to collect the necessary data a few modifications and additions were made to the existing mobile air conditioning test facility.  The tests that were conducted used an electronic expansion valve (EEV) in an attempt to precisely control the mass flow through the expansion device.  In order to actively control the EEV a control computer was installed to the test facility.  Spectrum’s Indy F3 Processor Board was installed to an existing PC to meet the challenge. Feedback comes from the temperature at the inlet and outlet of the evaporator. Noise is measured using a microphone placed flush with inner wall of the pipe downstream of the EEV.  Fig. 1 shows the control loop.
 

Project Objectives


Experimental Procedure

Status of refrigerant
  - Temperature and Pressure measurements at every non-redundant point throughout the loop
  - Signals from thermocouples and pressure transducers are recorded and reduced through HP-VEE

Acoustic Emissions (2 ways of estimating noise)
  - Accelerometers on tube wall
  - Microphone flush to inner tube wall
  - Sample at 50kHz

Feedback to Controller
  - Temperatures of the refrigerant at inlet and outlet of evaporator
  - Thermocouple  ->  -10 V…+10 V  ->  ADC  ->  controller
 
 
 
 
 
Fig 1A/C - controller interaction
 

Control Objectives

Eric Wandell [1997] had shown that closing the EEV at startup can reduce compressor torque.  So, by having the EEV closed when the clutch is thrown, torque on the compressor can be reduced.  If the torque is reduced, then the compressor experiences less wear.  Wandell’s findings were only relevant for the first 12 seconds after startup.

Once the valve is open, and if the system is hot enough, high speed vapor will come whistling through the evaporator.  Simply by constricting the flow, it is believed that less noise will be present in the system.  This can be accomplished by only opening the EEV some small amount, initially.  Once two-phase refrigerant is detected in the lines, the valve can process to a standard control algorithm.  Two-phase refrigerant can be detected when the temperature of the refrigerant drops below some known value.  This is when the refrigerant has some liquid to vaporize, thus, cooling the refrigerant.

The algorithm will be composed of three distinct modes:  a delay mode, an open mode, and a PID mode.  The delay mode is when the EEV is fully closed, and the clutch is engaged.  This is to reduce the torque on the compressor during startup.  Once the delay mode is over, the open mode begins.  This is when the EEV opens some predetermined amount.  The high-speed refrigerant vapor races through the evaporator, but, hopefully, the noise will be attenuated due to the throttling by the EEV.  The open mode will continue until the temperature at the inlet of the evaporator drops below some known value.  At this time there is now two-phase refrigerant.  Finally, the PID mode is reached.  Basically, the DSP will read in the two temperatures, compute the error term, then compute the PID value to be sent to EEV.  Of course for the system to work efficiently, the tuning parameters must be correct.

First, a detailed characterization of the acoustic emissions of the EEV was established.  Fig 2 shows how total sound pressure level (a means to measure acoustic emissions) is related to quality at the exit of the EEV.  Data points for a similar orifice tube were plotted along with the EEV data as reference.  The data reveals that the EEV does follow similar trends, but it is much quieter.
 

RESULTS
August 4th, 1998 in Mobil A/C lab
Develop correlation between valve opening and RMS noise

Accelerometer on tube wall to quantify noise
 


 

What conditions cause our Sporlan EEV to create noise?
Establish how the EEV should behave.
 


 

Another finding  was that there is less high frequency content of acoustic emissions in two-phase flow (of refrigerant). The frequency spectrum seems to “roll off” as the frequency increases.  But, this finding did not agree with data taken in the Mobile A/C Lab.  From the data taken in the Mobile A/C Lab the frequency spectrum of the acoustic emissions from the EEV during two-phase flow was relatively flat over the mid to high frequencies.  This result contradicted what was expected.  A slight variation in the way data was taken between a previous project and this project was discovered.  The instrumentation (internal microphone) was closer to the EEV in the Mobile Lab than it was in the previous project's lab.  The following hypothesis was formed: High frequency acoustic emissions are more easily attenuated in two-phase flow of refrigerant exiting the expansion valve.  The low frequency content is much less attenuated.
 



TOP OF PAGE   |   BACK to engineering credentials   |   BACK to engineering projects   |   JAMES' HOME


last modified 3 august 2000                         send problems and queries to webmaster at:  jamessolberg@hotmail.com